Jinn Guard — Enterprise Semantic Firewall

Jinn Guard is an **asynchronous, kernel-aware semantic firewall** that enforces mathematical safety constraints on autonomous AI agents before any tool executes. It intercepts agent intents and validates them through a **Z3 SMT solver pipeline**, checking state transitions and risk ceilings against formalized compliance models. Built for AlphaOS, it operates over UNIX domain sockets and integrates **eBPF kernel telemetry** for zero-trust isolation and anti-replay protection. Key features include HMAC-SHA256 authentication, SO_PEERCRED process identity, per-agent intent allowlists, sequence quotas, replay attack protection, behavioral drift detection, and a hash-chained audit log. Performance benchmarks show ~6,500 decisions/second with median latency of 257 µs. The system blocks 12 attack types (replay, signature forgery, injection, etc.) with zero fail-open. It includes a Python SDK, systemd service, and installer. The repository is a **validated research prototype** (not enterprise-GA) with extensive testing on Debian, Ubuntu, and AlmaLinux. 

https://github.com/AlphaReasoning/The-Jinn-Guard

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prompt Engineering Demands Rigorous Evaluation

In the blog post “Prompt Engineering Requires Evaluation” on the Shostack + Associates website, the author argues that treating prompts for large language models (LLMs) merely as creative artefacts is insufficient. Engineering prompts properly demands structured evaluation frameworks — what the AI community calls “evals” — to test which prompt versions work better, with which models, and under which conditions. The post highlights that simply assuming a prompt is “good enough” creates risks when LLMs are integrated into production systems (e.g., for threat modeling). It advocates for measuring prompt performance, variation effects, and tool-chain dependencies (model, context, ancillary materials).  Ultimately the message is: prompt engineering should borrow disciplined practices from software engineering (versioning, testing, benchmarking) rather than relying on informal experimentation.  https://shostack.org/blog/prompt-enignieering-requires-evaluation/
Read more

SecObserve: Simplified Vulnerability and License Management for CI/CD Pipelines

 SecObserve is an open-source tool for managing vulnerabilities and licenses in software development and cloud environments. It integrates various vulnerability scanners into CI/CD pipelines using GitLab CI templates and GitHub Actions for streamlined setup. It offers a centralized dashboard for assessing and reporting vulnerabilities, with tools for filtering, sorting, and evaluating results. SecObserve supports automation and manual assessments to focus on resolving critical issues.  https://github.com/MaibornWolff/SecObserve/tree/dev
Read more

Top Post-Quantum Cryptography Solutions and Vendors Ranked for Quantum-Safe Security

The article reviews and ranks nine post-quantum cryptography providers whose products use NIST-approved quantum-resistant algorithms to safeguard systems as quantum computing advances, driven by impending federal mandates and increasing enterprise demand. It evaluates vendors on security strength, performance, ease of integration, deployment history, use-case support, and roadmap, highlighting offerings spanning blockchain protection, enterprise crypto-agility, hardware-level security, PKI lifecycle tools, quantum entropy key systems, and quantum key distribution to address the transition from classical cryptography to quantum-safe defenses.  https://aijourn.com/top-9-post-quantum-cryptography-solutions-compared-pqc-providers-ranked/
Read more