Corporate Insiders and How They Operate

This article explains that some of the most damaging threats to a company come not from external hackers but from insiders—people already inside the organization with legitimate access. An insider can be an employee, contractor, vendor, or former worker whose access was never removed. Threats fall into three categories: malicious insiders who intentionally steal or sabotage for money, revenge, or ideology; negligent insiders who cause harm through carelessness like clicking phishing links or sharing passwords; and compromised insiders whose accounts are taken over by external attackers. Modern insiders often exploit cloud services, collaboration tools, and remote work environments, gradually moving small amounts of data to avoid detection. Motivations include financial gain, recruitment by organized crime, or workplace disputes. Detection requires analyzing system logs, access patterns, and behavioral changes, while prevention relies on least-privilege access, continuous monitoring, audits, and a strong organizational culture. The article concludes that the next major breach may start not with a hacker, but with someone who already knows where the coffee machine is. 

https://shouldicallthecops.com/corporate-insiders-and-how-they-operate/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prompt Engineering Demands Rigorous Evaluation

In the blog post “Prompt Engineering Requires Evaluation” on the Shostack + Associates website, the author argues that treating prompts for large language models (LLMs) merely as creative artefacts is insufficient. Engineering prompts properly demands structured evaluation frameworks — what the AI community calls “evals” — to test which prompt versions work better, with which models, and under which conditions. The post highlights that simply assuming a prompt is “good enough” creates risks when LLMs are integrated into production systems (e.g., for threat modeling). It advocates for measuring prompt performance, variation effects, and tool-chain dependencies (model, context, ancillary materials).  Ultimately the message is: prompt engineering should borrow disciplined practices from software engineering (versioning, testing, benchmarking) rather than relying on informal experimentation.  https://shostack.org/blog/prompt-enignieering-requires-evaluation/
Read more

SecObserve: Simplified Vulnerability and License Management for CI/CD Pipelines

 SecObserve is an open-source tool for managing vulnerabilities and licenses in software development and cloud environments. It integrates various vulnerability scanners into CI/CD pipelines using GitLab CI templates and GitHub Actions for streamlined setup. It offers a centralized dashboard for assessing and reporting vulnerabilities, with tools for filtering, sorting, and evaluating results. SecObserve supports automation and manual assessments to focus on resolving critical issues.  https://github.com/MaibornWolff/SecObserve/tree/dev
Read more

NIST Updates Guidelines: Focus on Strong Passwords and MFA Over Frequent Rotation

 NIST has updated its guidelines, advising against mandatory password changes every 30-90 days unless a breach occurs. Frequent changes often lead to weak passwords, as users may make minimal adjustments. The focus has shifted to strong passwords and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) as more effective security measures. Despite this, automated password rotation remains crucial for securing sensitive accounts, especially for privileged users. It helps prevent unauthorized access, reduces exposure time, and ensures strong, unique passwords without burdening users. https://www.techradar.com/pro/navigating-nists-updated-password-rotation-guidelines
Read more