The FTC Is Already Regulating AI — Most Companies Just Haven't Noticed

This article argues that the FTC is already actively regulating AI using existing authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices), without needing new laws from Congress. The enforcement sweep, called Operation AI Comply (launched September 2024), targets three violation categories: unsubstantiated performance claims (e.g., Workado claimed 98% accuracy but tested at 53%), capability claims that don't hold up (e.g., DoNotPay's "robot lawyer" resulted in a $193,000 settlement), and AI tools that enable deception (e.g., Rytr's testimonial generator). The largest penalty so far was an $18 million judgment against Air AI in March 2026. The March 2026 FTC AI Policy Statement extends enforcement to AI agents and automated decision-making, with key provisions including disclosure requirements (consumers must know they're interacting with AI), logging of decision-making criteria and inputs/outputs, substantiation for all "AI-powered" marketing claims, and algorithmic disgorgement (FTC can order deletion of models trained on improperly collected data). Fines can reach $53,000 per violation starting in 2027. The article advises companies to audit marketing claims, build audit trails into architecture, review training data provenance, and not wait for Congress. 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ftc-already-regulating-ai-most-companies-just-havent-noticed-jim-zh1ue/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prompt Engineering Demands Rigorous Evaluation

In the blog post “Prompt Engineering Requires Evaluation” on the Shostack + Associates website, the author argues that treating prompts for large language models (LLMs) merely as creative artefacts is insufficient. Engineering prompts properly demands structured evaluation frameworks — what the AI community calls “evals” — to test which prompt versions work better, with which models, and under which conditions. The post highlights that simply assuming a prompt is “good enough” creates risks when LLMs are integrated into production systems (e.g., for threat modeling). It advocates for measuring prompt performance, variation effects, and tool-chain dependencies (model, context, ancillary materials).  Ultimately the message is: prompt engineering should borrow disciplined practices from software engineering (versioning, testing, benchmarking) rather than relying on informal experimentation.  https://shostack.org/blog/prompt-enignieering-requires-evaluation/
Read more

SecObserve: Simplified Vulnerability and License Management for CI/CD Pipelines

 SecObserve is an open-source tool for managing vulnerabilities and licenses in software development and cloud environments. It integrates various vulnerability scanners into CI/CD pipelines using GitLab CI templates and GitHub Actions for streamlined setup. It offers a centralized dashboard for assessing and reporting vulnerabilities, with tools for filtering, sorting, and evaluating results. SecObserve supports automation and manual assessments to focus on resolving critical issues.  https://github.com/MaibornWolff/SecObserve/tree/dev
Read more

Secure Vibe Coding Guide: Best Practices for Writing Secure Code

Ken Huang's "Secure Vibe Coding Guide" emphasizes the importance of integrating security into the software development lifecycle. The guide provides best practices for writing secure code, including input validation, proper authentication mechanisms, and secure data storage techniques. It also highlights the necessity of regular code reviews and staying updated with the latest security vulnerabilities and patches. By following these guidelines, developers can create applications that are resilient against common security threats and contribute to a safer digital environment.  https://kenhuangus.substack.com/p/secure-vibe-coding-guide
Read more