The Missing Layer in Cybersecurity: Business Context

Security leaders are investing heavily in cybersecurity—new tools, bigger budgets, skilled personnel—but many organisations still suffer major losses because they lack business context in their risk programs. Simply counting vulnerabilities, patch cycles, and technical severity scores misses how risks map to the critical assets, operations, revenue, and potential regulatory liability of the business. Without linking exposures to business priorities—understanding which assets are most essential, what downtime costs, and how disruptions affect customers—security efforts become reactive rather than strategic.

The 2025 State of Cyber Risk Assessment Report shows nearly half of organisations now have a formal cyber risk program. Yet most still treat risk as a technical rather than business concern. Very few present risk in financial or operational terms. Only a small fraction update asset risk profiles monthly or prioritise based on business objectives.

To close this gap, organisations must integrate asset criticality, dependencies, and financial impact into everyday decision-making. They should move from detection to direction by using scenario modelling, prioritising remediation based on business impact not just severity, automating parts of the risk lifecycle, and improving board-level reporting with metrics tied to business outcomes. Doing cybersecurity as a business function rather than an IT silo makes the difference between reactive costs and resilience and value protection. 

https://securitybrief.co.nz/story/the-missing-layer-in-cybersecurity-business-context

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Secure Vibe Coding Guide: Best Practices for Writing Secure Code

KEVIntel: Real-Time Intelligence on Exploited Vulnerabilities

OWASP SAMM Skills Framework Enhances Software Security Roles