CVSS 4.0 vs CVSS 3.1: A Comparison of Vulnerability Scoring and Risk Assessment

 The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is used to assess the severity of vulnerabilities, with scores ranging from 0 to 10. CVSS 4.0, released in November 2023, generally assigns higher base scores than CVSS 3.1 due to its more detailed evaluation of exploitability and impact factors. However, these higher scores may not always reflect the actual risk in specific environments, as default settings often overlook organizational contexts. This can lead to misallocation of resources when prioritizing vulnerability remediation. The analysis highlights the importance of considering contextual factors for better risk assessment and prioritization.

https://securityboulevard.com/2025/01/cvss-3-1-vs-cvss-4-0-a-look-at-the-data/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Endor Labs Announces Integrated SAST Offerings

 Endor Labs recently announced that their Static Application Security Testing (SAST) toolset will be integrated into their platform, enhancing software security. This offering aims to help developers identify and fix code vulnerabilities earlier in the development cycle. By combining SAST with dependency management, Endor Labs provides a streamlined approach to managing and securing both custom code and third-party dependencies in a unified platform, which can improve efficiency and reduce security risks. For more details, you can read the full article  .
Read more

OWASP Releases Enhanced Dependency-Check Tool with Advanced Tagging and Policy Management Features

 OWASP has released an updated version of its dependency-check tool, version 4.12.0, which identifies vulnerabilities in third-party software components, enforces policy compliance, and generates a CycloneDX-based Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). Key updates include enhanced tag features for improved control over security alerts and SBOM validation, a new tag management view, a global policy violation audit view, and authorization for security status badges. These changes offer more granular control over managing third-party dependencies, though experts note that managing software risk remains an ongoing challenge despite these improvements. https://securityboulevard.com/2024/10/owasps-dependency-check-tool-update-key-changes-and-limitations/ ps.  I think Security Boulevard (https://securityboulevard.com/) is a little bit confused here. https://securityboulevard.com/2024/10/owasps-dependency-check-tool-update-key-changes-and-limitations/ The original news links to Dependency...
Read more

The Hidden Cost of DevSecOps: Time and Financial Burden of Security on Developers

 A survey by JFrog, "The Hidden Cost of DevSecOps: A Developer’s Time Assessment," reveals that developers spend a significant amount of time on security-related tasks, costing companies around $28,000 per developer annually. Half of senior developers and team leaders report a notable increase in weekly hours dedicated to security tasks like manual application scans, context switching, and secrets detection. This time detracts from innovation and delivering new applications. JFrog’s CTO, Asaf Karas, emphasized the inefficiency caused by juggling multiple tools and environments, advocating for streamlined security processes to boost efficiency and reduce risks. Many developers spend 19% of their weekly hours on security tasks, often outside regular work hours, resulting in a reactive approach to security. https://informationsecuritybuzz.com/the-hidden-price-of-devsecops/
Read more