Layered Threat Modeling: A Strategic Approach for Enterprise Architects

Check the guest article at https://www.toreon.com/threat-modeling-insider-november-2024/

The article explores the concept of Layered Threat Modeling, an approach that applies different sets of threats at varying architectural layers, inspired by enterprise architecture frameworks like TOGAF. The model divides threats into two layers: the architectural layer (conceptual perspective) and the solution layer (logical perspective). Higher-order "meta-attacks" are used in the architectural layer, while specific "standard attacks" are applied at the solution level. This layering ensures the threat model remains relevant and focused for different stakeholders, such as enterprise architects and security analysts. It concludes by emphasizing the importance of adapting threat models for different perspectives and leveraging frameworks like ArchiMate for practical implementation.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Endor Labs Announces Integrated SAST Offerings

 Endor Labs recently announced that their Static Application Security Testing (SAST) toolset will be integrated into their platform, enhancing software security. This offering aims to help developers identify and fix code vulnerabilities earlier in the development cycle. By combining SAST with dependency management, Endor Labs provides a streamlined approach to managing and securing both custom code and third-party dependencies in a unified platform, which can improve efficiency and reduce security risks. For more details, you can read the full article  .
Read more

OWASP Releases Enhanced Dependency-Check Tool with Advanced Tagging and Policy Management Features

 OWASP has released an updated version of its dependency-check tool, version 4.12.0, which identifies vulnerabilities in third-party software components, enforces policy compliance, and generates a CycloneDX-based Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). Key updates include enhanced tag features for improved control over security alerts and SBOM validation, a new tag management view, a global policy violation audit view, and authorization for security status badges. These changes offer more granular control over managing third-party dependencies, though experts note that managing software risk remains an ongoing challenge despite these improvements. https://securityboulevard.com/2024/10/owasps-dependency-check-tool-update-key-changes-and-limitations/ ps.  I think Security Boulevard (https://securityboulevard.com/) is a little bit confused here. https://securityboulevard.com/2024/10/owasps-dependency-check-tool-update-key-changes-and-limitations/ The original news links to Dependency...
Read more

The Hidden Cost of DevSecOps: Time and Financial Burden of Security on Developers

 A survey by JFrog, "The Hidden Cost of DevSecOps: A Developer’s Time Assessment," reveals that developers spend a significant amount of time on security-related tasks, costing companies around $28,000 per developer annually. Half of senior developers and team leaders report a notable increase in weekly hours dedicated to security tasks like manual application scans, context switching, and secrets detection. This time detracts from innovation and delivering new applications. JFrog’s CTO, Asaf Karas, emphasized the inefficiency caused by juggling multiple tools and environments, advocating for streamlined security processes to boost efficiency and reduce risks. Many developers spend 19% of their weekly hours on security tasks, often outside regular work hours, resulting in a reactive approach to security. https://informationsecuritybuzz.com/the-hidden-price-of-devsecops/
Read more